Thank you for the summary. I find it impossible to enjoy and participate with Matt focusing the meeting on his uniquely personal beliefs anymore, so I will be taking a break.
They may be David! I know that other events have been recorded and made available so I believe this one will as well. I will advise, thank you for your interest. 🙏❤️😀
“…seeing Fuji planted solidly, majestically where it had always been.”
This “story”, brings NOW / ‘I’ into immediate focus, and as such, it is not a story at all.
Thank you, Dustin!
I’ve been keeping my audio muted when I’m not talking, so that others can see when I wish to talk. When I’m talking, I always mute when I’m done, to indicate that others may speak. However, some people can’t reach their Mute button from where they’re sitting, so I propose that we find a different way to indicate that each person “has the floor” and is speaking. For example, each person could put something around their neck to indicate that they are speaking (a necklace or a piece of string). Otherwise, with some people, there are pauses that can seem like they have stopped speaking, so they get interrupted often, which I’m sure doesn’t feel fair to them.
Since this post is specifically addressed to me, it seems obvious that I’m expected to respond. My response is that I find all of the teachings listed here to be without flaw. As I consider each one, I find it true. However, I also wonder that Holger addresses them to me, rather than to everyone. Why are they aimed just to me?
I think there is an implication that I need these instructions, that I am not aware of them, or that I could benefit from them.
But why me, and not everyone? Why am I the only one to whom these bits of wisdom (apparently validated by the great sainted Magdi himself) are directed?
Holger has maintained this teaching posture toward me for months now, publicly and especially via email. But he has also acknowledged my good familiarity with nonduality. So why would I need special coaching from Holger? And why, now, in such a public way?
I can only conclude that Holger judges me as faulty in some way, and as needing his teaching. Either he is aware of some lack in me that he is afraid to express directly, using plain words, to this group, a lack about which that he thinks I’m unaware, OR Holger is using me to deal with ego-based discomforts in himself by his constant playing the teacher with me.
I think it is now a good time for Holger to consider these alternatives and communicate a little more truthfully to me and to the group. It is time, Holger, to stop hiding behind dogmatic nonduality statements and start acting like a human being with a heart.
I try to be open and honest about myself in this group, whenever I become the subject of discussion; I’d like to see Holger try for once to do the same. Please find within yourself compassion and respect for another on your path, instead of repeatedly insulting me by treating me as a spiritually resistant beginner.
Why do you assume that this post is for “you”?
It is about the Bible, in response to a “Song for David”; there are millions of Davids in the world.
Do you reflect on your own words?
Who is this “me” that suffers?
All the things you conveniently ‘blame’ on Holger are your own opportunities to inquire.
I am not “maintaining a teaching posture”… I am just being myself, giving lots of space to David.
You share your deep desire to be free of faulty thinking and misidentification;
please make up your mind, be brave.
“Die before you die” is not ego kindergarten, but facing our root fear, seeing where our investments are.
They were standing under a tree, each with an arm round the other’s neck, and Alice knew which was which in a moment, because one of them had “Dum” embroidered on his collar, and the other “Dee.” “I suppose they’ve each got “Tweedle” round the back of the collar,” she said to herself.
They stood so still that she quite forgot they were alive, and she was just looking round to see if the word “Tweedle” was written at the back of each collar, when she was startled by a voice coming from the one marked “Dum.”
“If you think we’re waxworks,” he said, “you ought to pay, you know.
Waxworks weren’t made to be looked at for nothing, nohow!”
“Contrariwise,” added the one marked “Dee,” “if you think we’re alive, you ought to speak.”
“I’m sure I’m very sorry,” was all Alice could say; for the words of the old song kept ringing through her head like the ticking of a clock, and she could hardly help saying them out loud:
“Tweedledum and Tweedledee
Agreed to have a battle;
For Tweedledum said Tweedledee
Had spoiled his nice new rattle.
“Just then flew down a monstrous crow,
As black as a tar-barrel;
Which frightened both the heroes so,
They quite forgot their quarrel.”
[etc.]
*with gratitude to Lewis Carroll, from Through
the Looking-Glass, and gratitude to my parents,
who first gave me that book, along with Alice in
Wonderland (with the original illustrations by
the amazing John Tenniel.)
From David Spector on Meeting Notes 03-28
Go to comment2022/03/28 at 10:06 am
From H Hubbs on Meeting Notes 03-28
Go to comment2022/03/28 at 10:13 am
From David Spector on Spring Forward LIVE Event
Go to comment2022/03/27 at 9:44 am
From Walter Cecchini on Spring Forward LIVE Event
Go to comment2022/03/27 at 9:46 am
From Walter Cecchini on The first winds of spring (short story)
Go to comment2022/03/25 at 11:45 am
From Theophilus41 on The first winds of spring (short story)
Go to comment2022/03/24 at 10:55 am
From David Spector on Thoughts for David
Go to comment2022/03/20 at 3:40 pm
From H Hubbs on Thoughts for David
Go to comment2022/03/20 at 10:15 pm
From Kevin on Thoughts for David
Go to comment2022/03/20 at 1:34 pm
From David Spector on Policies & Procedures
Go to comment2022/03/20 at 12:08 pm
From David Spector on Thoughts for David
Go to comment2022/03/20 at 10:27 am
From H Hubbs on Thoughts for David
Go to comment2022/03/20 at 1:53 pm
From Shannon O'Connor on Thoughts for David
Go to comment2022/03/20 at 10:06 am
From Magdi Badawy on Thoughts for David
Go to comment2022/03/20 at 8:45 am